ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
A temporal deep learning algorithm for prediction of extubation failures in critical care patients.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extubation failure in ICU patients is associated with poor outcomes. Existing prediction models often rely on static data, missing dynamic disease fluctuations. This study introduces TrAcE, a deep learning-based model integrating static and temporal data for improved extubation failure prediction with explainable results. The model was trained and validated using MIMIC-III (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III) data and tested on the LOCAL-Ext (a local database for extubation) dataset. A Transformer-based neural network with temporal fusion was used to screen extubation records (Patients planned for post-extubation non-invasive ventilation or tracheostomy were excluded). Model performance was assessed using AUROC (area under the receiver operating curve) and AUPRC (area under the precision recall curve). Explainability was ensured via Captum's occlusion method, identifying feature attributions at both population and individual levels. TrAcE's extubation timing was compared to the spontaneous breathing test (SBT) in LOCAL-Ext. From MIMIC-III, 5,895 patients (4,126 for training, 1,729 for validation) were selected. LOCAL-Ext included 6,765 test patients. TrAcE outperformed other models, achieving AUROCs of 0.823 (95% CI: 0.808-0.838) in validation and 0.859 (95% CI: 0.836-0.881) in testing, with favorable AUPRCs (0.734 and 0.757, respectively). Compared to SBT in LOCAL-Ext, TrAcE identified suitable extubation days earlier (4.32 [IQR 0-20] vs. 5.65 [IQR 0-23], p < 0.01). In the present study, we developed a deep learning model (TrAcE) for predicting extubation failure in critical care patients. This model can process both static and dynamic data, provides risk prediction and explainability in real-time. Furthermore, it demonstrated an advantage over SBT procedures in promptly identifying patients ready for extubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.