ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Comparison of monoplanar, cross-table bull's-eye, and a hybrid ultrasound-fluoroscopy technique for renal access in supine PCNL: a cognitive mapping approach.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePercutaneous needle access is a critical step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Supine PCNL, favored for its anesthetic and physiological benefits, can be performed using various puncture techniques. This study compared the efficacy and radiation safety of monoplanar, cross-table bull's-eye, and a combined ultrasound (US)-fluoroscopy-guided access technique for supine PCNL.
methodsBetween January 2021 and March 2025, 130 patients undergoing supine PCNL were reviewed in three groups: monoplanar (Group A, n = 41), cross-table bull's-eye (Group B, n = 45), and combined US-fluoroscopy (Group C, n = 44). In Group C, pre-procedural US established a cognitive vectorial roadmap to determine needle trajectory and depth. Punctures were performed under 0° fluoroscopy, with on-demand refinements using 0-30° rotation and cephalad angulation for depth verification. Perioperative outcomes and radiation times were compared.
resultsTotal operative time, stone-free (SF) rates, complications, blood transfusion rates, creatinine (Cr) change, hemoglobin (Hb) loss, nephrostomy and hospital stay did not differ significantly among groups (p > 0.05). However, mean fluoroscopy time for successful puncture was significantly lower in the combined US-fluoroscopy group (26.59 s) compared to monoplanar (42.82 s) and cross-table bull's-eye (40.62 s) techniques (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe combined US-fluoroscopy-guided technique is feasible for supine PCNL and significantly reduces radiation exposure. By integrating US-derived cognitive planning with on-demand fluoroscopic verification, this hybrid approach facilitates efficient needle puncture without compromising procedural precision or clinical success. It serves as a valuable alternative for optimizing radiation safety in urologic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42095979What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.