Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095913›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2026

Entrustable Professional Activity Framework Implementation and Impressions from U.S. and Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Training Programs.

Michael E Kim, Ashley Neal, Ruchika Karnik, Lowell H Frank, David Turner, Colin J McMahon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael E KimDivision of Cardiac Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. michael.kim@seattlechildrens.org.
Ashley NealThe Heart Institute, Department of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ruchika KarnikYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lowell H FrankDivision of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
David TurnerAmerican Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Colin J McMahonDepartment Paediatric Cardiology, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical training assessment frameworks have continued to evolve to effectively capture clinical competency and graduation readiness. Entrustable Professional Activities are being integrated into training programs and describe the activities expected in practice to guide education and assessment. U.S. Pediatric cardiology fellowship programs have been working on creating and implementing these since 2015. We sought to investigate the current landscape of EPA implementation and perceptions amongst fellowship training program directors.

methodsThis was a mixed-methods study with grounded theory employing both qualitative and quantitative assessments utilizing a survey instrument distributed to the Society of Pediatric Cardiology Training Program Directors from August 2023 to October 2023. Open-ended prompts were manually coded by two independent team members followed by theme creation. Demographics and descriptive statistics were summarized by frequencies with percentages and Likert-scale responses were tabulated.

results24 of 62 pediatric cardiology program directors (39%) completed the study. >80% of respondents used a competency-based framework with/without milestones with ~ 40% utilizing EPA-based assessments. Programs utilizing EPA-based assessment report high satisfaction with their ability to capture trainee performance longitudinally. There is overall good familiarity with the EPA framework amongst all participants. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: (1) EPA-based assessments provide objective, practical, goal-oriented assessments; (2) Significant effort and time are required from faculty and program directors assessing EPAs; (3) Major limiting factors assessing clinical fellows include a lack of comprehensive and consistent assessment from evaluators that may not necessarily be solved by the EPA framework alone.

conclusionNear half of pediatric cardiology fellowship programs who responded in this study have begun to implement the EPA framework to facilitate trainee assessment. While there are perceived strengths with the addition of EPAs, early reservations also exist and continued follow-up should be done for both programs and training cohorts who were assessed under the EPA model.

Indexed as

Competency-based assessmentsEPAsFellowship trainingMedical education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.