ArticleJournal of psychopathology and clinical science2026
Transactional relations between attentional biases for affective stimuli and depressive symptoms in offspring of mothers with and without major depressive disorder.
Article in Journal of psychopathology and clinical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transactional relations between attentional biases for affective stimuli and depressive symptoms in offspring of mothers with and without major depressive disorder.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attentional biases toward depression-relevant stimuli (e.g., sad faces) are thought to contribute to the development and maintenance of depression, but research in youth is limited and primarily cross-sectional. Therefore, it remains unclear whether such biases are risk factors for, versus consequences of, depression (or both), and whether these links may be stronger among youth already at risk for depression due to a family history of the disorder. To address these questions, the present multiwave longitudinal study followed 242 mothers and their offspring (ages 8-14; 51.65% girls, 81.40% non-Hispanic White) over 2 years with assessments every 6 months (five assessments total) to examine prospective relations between attentional biases (measured via a dot-probe eye-tracking task) and depressive symptoms in youth. Of the mothers, 123 had a history of major depressive disorder (MDD) during their child's life and the rest had no lifetime history of MDD. Using random intercepts cross-lagged panel models, we found that depressive symptoms predicted prospective changes in attentional biases, but not the reverse, and the pattern of attentional bias change differed based on maternal history of MDD. Specifically, among offspring of mothers with MDD, higher depressive symptoms at a given assessment predicted future increases in attentional bias to sad faces, whereas among offspring of never depressed mothers, higher depressive symptoms predicted subsequent decreases in attentional bias to happy faces. These findings suggest that experiences of depression may contribute to different patterns of attention to emotional cues based on maternal history of MDD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.