Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095779›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Impact of a Personalized, High-Dose, Intensive Motor Rehabilitation Program, Integrating Advanced Technology for Adults With Central Neurological Conditions (INTeRAcT): Protocol for a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial With a Clinical, Health Economic, and Process Evaluation.

Marjan Coremans, Ingue Allewijn, Filiep Bataillie, Laure De Bruyn, Maaike Fobelets, Femke Jacobs, Sienke Janssens, Laura Pattyn, Koen Putman, Agaat Schiltz and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marjan CoremansDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Leuven, Flanders, 3001, Belgium, +32 16329116.ORCID 0000-0002-4331-892X
Ingue AllewijnMedical Department, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0007-5613-9887
Filiep BataillieMedical Department, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0006-8548-763X
Laure De BruynDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Leuven, Flanders, 3001, Belgium, +32 16329116.ORCID 0009-0003-7307-8191
Maaike FobeletsDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8316-6422
Femke JacobsDepartment of Rehabilitation, To Walk Again, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0004-2638-0301
Sienke JanssensDepartment of Rehabilitation, To Walk Again, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0006-4624-2437
Laura PattynDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Leuven, Flanders, 3001, Belgium, +32 16329116.ORCID 0009-0004-7226-0634
Koen PutmanDepartment of Public Health, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-3759
Agaat SchiltzDepartment of Rehabilitation, To Walk Again, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0008-4652-6311
Lisa Tedesco TriccasDepartment for Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9097-9352
Floris Van ThienenDepartment of Rehabilitation, To Walk Again, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0006-4752-150X
Geert VerheydenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Leuven, Flanders, 3001, Belgium, +32 16329116.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-8175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI) lead to persistent motor impairments that reduce independence and quality of life. Although rehabilitation is essential to address these challenges, the amount of therapy provided during the chronic phase remains limited, while the long-term costs of care are substantial. Objective: The INTeRAcT (Intensive Rehabilitation Programme Integrating Advanced Technology) trial investigates a high-dose, intensive-targeted, and personalized rehabilitation program through an integrated clinical, health economic, and process evaluation. Methods: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will include 100 adults in the chronic phase after stroke or SCI. Participants will be randomized to either the INTeRAcT intervention group (n=50) or a control group receiving usual care (n=50). The intervention group will receive 90 hours of personalized motor rehabilitation over 3 weeks, including upper and lower limb therapy, with and without technology, cardiovascular fitness training, and self-management education. Both groups then resume usual care and are followed for 9 months. Clinical assessments are performed at baseline (T0), after 3 weeks (T1, postintervention), and after 9-months follow-up (T2) by a blinded assessor. The primary outcome is independence in daily life, assessed using the Functional Independence Measure for stroke and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure for SCI. Secondary outcomes include the EQ-5D-5L, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Goal Attainment Scaling, Fatigue Severity Scale, and stroke-specific measures such as the Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, 6-Minute and 10-Meter Walk-Test, and the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Group differences in clinical change will be analyzed using multivariate linear models. Health economic data will be collected using diaries and questionnaires, capturing direct and indirect costs. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed through a trial-based cost-utility analysis over 9 months and a Markov model over a lifetime horizon. The process evaluation follows the UK Medical Research Council framework, using mixed methods with quantitative and qualitative data from diaries, interviews, and observations, analyzed descriptively and thematically. Results: The funding of the project started in February 2023. Protocol version 5 (accepted March 15, 2024). Participant recruitment occurred between June 2023 and September 2024, with a total of 102 participants enrolled. Data collection ended in July 2025. Data analysis is ongoing. Conclusions: This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial integrating clinical, health economic, and process evaluations to assess a high-dose, individualized rehabilitation program. The findings will provide evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation feasibility in chronic stroke and SCI, supporting the optimization of long-term neurorehabilitation care.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesStroke RehabilitationAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodStrokechronic phaseclinical trialhealth economic evaluationhigh-dose therapypersonalized rehabilitationprocess evaluationrandomized controlled trialrehabilitationspinal cord injurystroke

Identifiers

PMID42095779
PMCPMC13151458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.