SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2026
CFTR modulator monotherapy for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del).
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleCystic fibrosis (CF) is a common, life-shortening genetic condition caused by a variant in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. A class II CFTR gene variant, F508del, is the commonest CF-causing variant (found in up to 90% of people with CF (pwCF) in some populations). The F508del variant lacks meaningful CFTR function: the faulty protein is degraded before reaching the cell membrane, where it would normally transport salt across the epithelial membrane. Corrective therapy with CFTR modulators could benefit many pwCF. This review evaluates treatment with single modulators (monotherapy).
objectivesTo evaluate the clinically important benefits and harms of CFTR modulator monotherapy in people of any age with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del). SEARCH
methodsWe last searched the Cochrane CF Trials Register and online trials registries on 27 June 2025. We also checked the reference lists of relevant articles for additional studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any single CFTR modulator to placebo or any other single CFTR modulator in pwCF of any age or disease severity with class II variants. OUTCOMES: Our critical outcomes were survival, quality of life (total score and respiratory domain), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV RISK OF BIAS: We assessed risk of bias using the original Cochrane tool (RoB 1). SYNTHESIS
methodsWe analysed available data with RevMan using a fixed-effect model. We reported odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes. For adverse events, we reported 99% confidence intervals (CIs); for all other outcomes, we reported 95% CIs. Where we were unable to analyse data, we reported the results narratively. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 10 early-phase placebo-controlled RCTs (424 participants) assessing eight different drugs (4PBA, CPX, N6022, cavosonstat, lumacaftor, FDL169, GLPG2222, and riociguat) in adults; one 4PBA study additionally included adolescents (age ≥ 14 years). All participants were homozygous for F508del. The longest study lasted just 29 days, so we could only assess immediate-term outcomes. Only two studies received no funding from pharmaceutical companies. Our main results are for lumacaftor and cavosonstat, which were the only drugs selected for further investigation in subsequent studies. SYNTHESIS OF
resultsInvestigators reported no deaths, but also no clinically relevant improvements in quality of life. There was insufficient evidence to determine effects on any measure of lung function. No studies demonstrated differences in the risk of mild, moderate, or severe adverse effects, including pulmonary exacerbations, between CFTR modulator monotherapy and placebo. The clinical relevance of adverse effects is difficult to assess, because each occurred in only a few participants per trial. We assessed the certainty of the evidence for two comparisons (lumacaftor versus placebo and cavosonstat versus placebo), rating the certainty of the evidence to be very low. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is a lack of evidence to support monotherapy with a CFTR modulator for pwCF who have two F508del variants (F508del/F508del).
fundingThis review was completed under a programme of work that is part of the CF Foundation grant funding for Cochrane CF. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251090914).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.