ArticleThe oncologist2026
Knowledge and awareness of colorectal cancer in central Uganda: a community cross-sectional survey.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Awareness of the mythical causes of cancer in central Uganda: a community cross-sectional survey.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproving public knowledge and awareness of cancer aids prevention and early detection, yet limited data exist on this subject in low- and middle-income African countries. This study aimed to assess knowledge and awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the general population of central Uganda.
methodsA community-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted among a random sample of 428 individuals from the general population in 2 districts of central Uganda. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and a modified version of the validated bowel cancer awareness measure. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with CRC awareness.
resultsJust over half of respondents had good awareness of CRC warning signs (57.9%, ≥ 6/9 correct responses), and risk factors (55.8%, ≥ 7/10 correct responses). Participants scored higher for awareness (responses to prompted questions), than knowledge (responses to unprompted questions) in relation to CRC warning signs (mean: 5.60 vs 0.46, out of 9) and risk factors (mean: 6.46 vs 0.22, out of 10). Residing in an urban area, lacking awareness of screenable cancers and not having private health insurance were associated with lower awareness of CRC warning signs. Being female and having non-degree tertiary education were associated with lower awareness of CRC risk factors.
conclusionThis study found very low CRC knowledge in central Uganda, despite good recognition of warning signs and risk factors, with notable rural-urban disparities. These findings highlight the need of reinforcing CRC prevention messages within ongoing cancer sensitization efforts to improve public understanding of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.