ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Conservation genomics of Pecos pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis).
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conservation genomics of Pecos pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis).Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Pecos pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis, is an imperilled freshwater fish found in arid regions of Texas and New Mexico (USA). The species faces multiple challenges to persistence including reductions in suitable habitat, water shortages, as well as hybridization and competition with an introduced congener (sheepshead minnow, C. variegatus). As part of the current management strategy, refuge populations, seeded with non-introgressed individuals collected from Texas, are maintained at the Fort Worth Zoo and on private property in West Texas. Therefore, assessments of standing genetic variation within and among wild and refuge populations and levels of admixture in the wild are critical for future conservation and management planning. Fin clips were acquired in 10 locations in the wild, five in Texas, five in New Mexico and from two refuge populations in Texas (one maintained by Fort Worth Zoo and another on a private property in West Texas). In Texas, non-introgressed C. pecosensis were found in the wild at only one location Upper Salt Creek (USC); all other locations were composed of admixed individuals or non-introgressed C. variegatus. No admixed individuals were found in New Mexico. Significant genetic heterogeneity was detected between all locations of non-introgressed C. pecosensis, including the refuge populations, and estimates of divergence between Texas locations (USC and refuge populations) and New Mexico locations were relatively large (F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.