Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095400›Full record

ArticleInfant mental health journal2026

Measuring the consultative stance among infant and early childhood mental health consultants.

Elly Miles, Kristin Klopfenstein, Allie Kallmann Wegner, Neda Senehi, Lisa Schlueter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infant mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elly MilesUrban Institute, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-8163
Kristin KlopfensteinColorado Evaluation and Action Lab, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-8160
Allie Kallmann WegnerColorado Evaluation and Action Lab, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Neda SenehiPublic Policy Associates, Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-7580
Lisa SchlueterColorado Department of Early Childhood, Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-5759

Funding

Preschool Development Grant Birth through Five Initiative (PDG B-5) 90TP0054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation (IECMHC) is a preventative intervention that is theorized to mediate its impacts through the consultative stance, described as a consultant's "way of being" in relationship. However, limited tools are available to measure the elements of the consultative stance or the degree to which consultants and supervisors assess its implementation. This study describes the conceptualization, development, and piloting of a set of tools in the United States measuring the consultative stance for use by consultants and supervisors, the Consultative Stance Learning and Measurement tools (CSLM). The CSLM includes the Consultant Self Reflection (CSR) and the Supervisor Survey (SS). Seventy-six consultants and 28 supervisors completed the tools at least once, with 48 consultants completing the tool at three timepoints. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the theorized latent structure of the tool, providing good support for the CSR and moderate support for the SS. Over time, consultants and supervisors increasingly aligned in their perceptions of consultant implementation of the consultative stance, though consultants rated their implementation lower than supervisors. The tools advance the field's capacity to measure the impact of IECMHC and provide targeted information for ongoing reflective supervision and training, as consultants develop their practice.

Indexed as

ConsultantsMental Health ServicesReferral and ConsultationAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesconsultative stanceearly childhood mental health consultation

Identifiers

PMID42095400
PMCPMC13150954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.