ArticleInfant mental health journal2026
Measuring the consultative stance among infant and early childhood mental health consultants.
Article in Infant mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation (IECMHC) is a preventative intervention that is theorized to mediate its impacts through the consultative stance, described as a consultant's "way of being" in relationship. However, limited tools are available to measure the elements of the consultative stance or the degree to which consultants and supervisors assess its implementation. This study describes the conceptualization, development, and piloting of a set of tools in the United States measuring the consultative stance for use by consultants and supervisors, the Consultative Stance Learning and Measurement tools (CSLM). The CSLM includes the Consultant Self Reflection (CSR) and the Supervisor Survey (SS). Seventy-six consultants and 28 supervisors completed the tools at least once, with 48 consultants completing the tool at three timepoints. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the theorized latent structure of the tool, providing good support for the CSR and moderate support for the SS. Over time, consultants and supervisors increasingly aligned in their perceptions of consultant implementation of the consultative stance, though consultants rated their implementation lower than supervisors. The tools advance the field's capacity to measure the impact of IECMHC and provide targeted information for ongoing reflective supervision and training, as consultants develop their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.