Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095388›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2026

Mentors' Experiences of Nursing Students' Peer Learning in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Sanna Kulojärvi, Sara Palander, Toni Haapa, Erika Jarva, Agostinho A C Araújo, Kristina Mikkonen, Jonna Juntunen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanna KulojärviWellbeing Services, County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4782-0441
Sara PalanderResearch Unit of Health Science and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-4226
Toni HaapaHelsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-2998
Erika JarvaResearch Unit of Health Science and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6860-4319
Agostinho A C AraújoRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-0385
Kristina MikkonenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-3428
Jonna JuntunenResearch Unit of Health Science and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-8265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo synthesise the best available evidence on mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning clinical practice.

designA systematic review of qualitative studies.

methodsQualitative or mixed-methods (with a qualitative component) studies that met the inclusion criteria based on the phenomenon of interest were included. The selected studies were critically appraised using the standardised JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Findings from qualitative research were extracted and synthesised by using the JBI meta-aggregation approach. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was conducted in September 2024 across six databases: Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, ProQuest (Education collection) and MEDIC.

resultsA total of 542 studies were screened, and 17 met the inclusion criteria. Three synthesised findings were identified: (1) Importance of pedagogical support for peer learning, (2) Mentors' support needs for mentoring in a peer learning model and (3) Characteristics of a favourable peer learning environment in clinical practice.

conclusionMentors perceive peer learning as beneficial for nursing students' learning. The transition from the traditional mentoring model to the peer learning model requires distinct pedagogical approaches and competences from mentors, which can be enhanced by strengthening mentors' peer-learning competence. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: It is essential to support mentors' competence in mentoring through peer learning by providing mentoring education. Learning models based on collaborative learning are beneficial for improving performance in clinical placements because they enable more nursing students to learn simultaneously in clinical practice. IMPACT: This systematic review provides synthesised evidence of mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning in clinical practice. Mentors' role is to provide pedagogical support for nursing students in clinical practice conducted with peer learning. Before implementing peer learning in clinical practice, it is essential to consider the conditions for peer learning across various clinical settings and to provide support for mentors as they mentor nursing students through peer learning. These findings can support healthcare administrators, educators, mentoring education providers and mentors of peer learning in clinical practice. REPORTING

methodThis review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered in The Open Science Framework (OSF): 10.17605/OSF.IO/5F9HP.

Indexed as

Education, NursingLearningMentorsPeer GroupStudents, NursingClinical CompetenceHumansQualitative Researchmentormentoring clinical practicenursing educationnursing studentpeer learningqualitative systematic review

Identifiers

PMID42095388
PMCPMC13661795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.