ArticleThe ultrasound journal2026
Splanchnic ultrasound to guide unloading in VA-ECMO.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients supported with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may require left ventricular (LV) unloading to prevent pulmonary congestion and adverse hemodynamic interactions. However, defining the need and timing of unloading remains challenging, as current approaches rely predominantly on cardiac and pulmonary parameters, often neglecting systemic and organ-level congestion. We report the case of a 53-year-old woman admitted with cardiogenic shock following pericardial drainage and mediastinal mass biopsy. Due to rapid hemodynamic deterioration, VA-ECMO was initiated, resulting in stabilization. Early echocardiographic assessment showed severe biventricular dysfunction but evidence of partial aortic valve opening without LV distension. To further characterize the hemodynamic profile, splanchnic Doppler ultrasound was performed, demonstrating preserved renal arterial flow (resistive index <0.72), continuous intrarenal venous flow, and low portal vein pulsatility (<30%), consistent with a non-congestive phenotype. Based on this integrated assessment, LV unloading was deferred. Subsequent pulmonary artery catheterization confirmed low filling pressures despite reduced cardiac output. A diagnosis of stress-induced cardiomyopathy was suspected, and levosimendan was administered, leading to rapid improvement in cardiac function and successful ECMO weaning. Final pathology revealed a thymic neuroendocrine carcinoma. This case highlights the limitations of relying solely on cardiac indices to guide LV unloading decisions during VA-ECMO. Splanchnic Doppler provided a non-invasive, real-time evaluation of the perfusion-congestion balance at the organ level, complementing echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic data. The integration of multimodal monitoring may allow a more comprehensive understanding of patient-device interaction and support individualized management strategies. Further research is needed to validate the role of splanchnic ultrasound in guiding unloading decisions and optimizing outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock supported by VA-ECMO.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.