ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
Predicting suicidal ideation in academic communities using machine learning methods: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research consistently shows that depression and suicidal ideation (SI) often cooccur. However, SI can arise without elevated depressive symptoms, suggesting that additional factors may also contribute. This study investigated the protective and vulnerability factors associated with SI beyond depressive symptomatology in the academic community. Methods: We employed multiple kernel learning (MKL) to distinguish participants with SI from those without SI. MKL incorporates the contribution of each psychometric instrument and specific items to the predictive model. Data were drawn from a large-scale online survey of the Brazilian academic community (N = 3828; 67.6% women; 33.2% black; mean age 38.28 years; SD 12.89 [95% CI: 31.6-33.1]). The models incorporated measures of depressive symptoms, optimism, loneliness, childhood maltreatment, and demographic characteristics. Findings: The MKL model accurately distinguished individuals with and without SI, achieving a mean balanced accuracy of 77.61% (95% CI: 77.40-77.82) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.860-0.864). While depressive symptoms were strong predictors, other variables, such as optimism, loneliness, childhood emotional maltreatment, and demographic characteristics together accounted for half the total weight in the classification model. Interpretation: These findings underscore the need for suicidal ideation screening protocols that consider a broader range of emotional and behavioral factors beyond depressive symptoms, particularly within academic communities. These insights may inform the design of targeted interventions to promote mental well-being in academic settings. Funding: Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation of Research Support in Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ: E-26.201.678/2022; E-26.201.118/2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.