Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095200›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Modified Maddocks Questions Tool in Spanish: evaluating comprehension among child soccer players aged 4-8.

Federico Baltar, Camila Blanco, Ailin Collazo, Agustín Figueira, Juliana Meyer, Gabriela Sosa, Florencia Pérez-Vidarte, Santiago Mansilla, Pedro Piccardo, Alcy R Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Federico BaltarUnidad Académica de Neuropediatría, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Camila BlancoCiclo Básico Metodológico, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Ailin CollazoCiclo Básico Metodológico, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Agustín FigueiraCiclo Básico Metodológico, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Juliana MeyerCiclo Básico Metodológico, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Gabriela SosaCiclo Básico Metodológico, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Florencia Pérez-VidarteUnidad Académica de Neuropediatría, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Santiago MansillaUnidad Académica de Métodos Cuantitativos, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pedro PiccardoUnidad Académica de Neuropediatría, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Alcy R TorresDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Modified Maddocks Questions Tool (MMQT) is part of the Concussion Recognition Protocol used for sideline assessment of suspected concussion. Although widely used in English-speaking populations, it has not been validated in Spanish-speaking children. This study aimed to evaluate comprehension and response accuracy of a Spanish-adapted MMQT in soccer players aged 4-8 years. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in Montevideo, Uruguay, between July and October 2024. Eighty-eight male soccer players aged 4-8 years were assessed at halftime using a Spanish-adapted version of the MMQT. Comprehension was evaluated by asking participants to reformulate each question. Associations between age, comprehension, and response accuracy were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression models. Results: No statistically significant association was found between age and either comprehension or accuracy. Overall comprehension exceeded 96%. However, Question 4 ("Which team won the last match?") consistently showed a lower correct response rate across all ages. Our findings reinforce previous observations showing that questions assessing recall of past events can be challenging for younger children and suggest caution when evaluating MMQT responses in this age group. Conclusions: The Spanish-adapted MMQT demonstrates high comprehension and may be suitable for sideline concussion screening in children aged 5-8 years. However, Question 4 appears less reliable and should be reconsidered in future versions. A conservative approach is recommended, whereby any incorrect response warrants removal from play for further evaluation.

Indexed as

4–8 yearschild soccer playerscomprehensionModified Maddocks Questions ToolSpanish

Identifiers

PMID42095200
PMCPMC13139062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.