ArticleBJUI compass2026
Single-port robot-assisted ureterolysis for retroperitoneal fibrosis: A less invasive path to functional recovery.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of an initial series of single-port robot-assisted ureterolysis (SP-RAU) in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF). Patients and Methods: We prospectively collected surgical and clinical data from all consecutive patients undergoing SP-RAU at our institution between April 2016 and May 2024. The primary endpoint was the achievement of a stent-free status at 12 months. Results: Overall, 16 patients (21 renal units) underwent SP-RAU with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All five patients with bilateral disease were managed with a staged approach in two separate surgical sessions. RPF was idiopathic in 37% and secondary in 62% of cases. Four procedures (19%) were aborted due to extensive fibrosis or high vascular risk (one unilateral right, two unilateral left and one second-stage left unit). These patients had significantly longer preoperative stent duration (60 vs. 9 months; Conclusion: SP-RAU is a safe and feasible minimally invasive option for managing RPF. It achieves good functional success with minimal morbidity and enables same-day discharge in over half of patients. Larger multicentre studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and establish the role of SP-RAU in the management of RPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.