Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095197›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2026

Assessment of anatomical outcomes in the upper urinary tract following flexible ureteroscopy with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath: 1-year results from a multicentre study.

Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Chi-Fai Ng, Khi Yung Fong, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Boyke Soebhali, Mohamed Elshazly, Vigen Malkhasyan, Karl Tan, Luis Rico, Mehmet Ilker Gokce and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Steffi Kar Kei YuenS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-1558
Chi-Fai NgS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.
Khi Yung FongDepartment of Urology Singapore General Hospital Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-0800
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology University Hospital Southampton, NHS Trust Southampton UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478
Boyke SoebhaliDepartment of Urology, Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital Medical Faculty Muliawarman University Samarinda Indonesia.
Mohamed ElshazlyUrology Department Menoufia University Shibin el Kom Egypt.
Vigen MalkhasyanDepartment of Urology, Moscow Urology Center Botkin Hospital Moscow Russia.
Karl TanDepartment of Urology Veterans Memorial Medical Center Quezon City Philippines.
Luis RicoDepartment of Urology Hospital Alemán de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9354-3570
Mehmet Ilker GokceDepartment of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine Department of Urology Ankara Turkey.
Han Jie LeeDepartment of Urology Singapore General Hospital Singapore.
Nariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology Saint Petersburg State University Hospital St. Petersburg Russian Federation.
Tzevat TefikDepartment of Urology Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Istanbul Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-8332
Jianwei CaoXinhua Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China.
Albert El HajjDepartment of Urology American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-7195
Chi-Ho LeungS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-9390
Jeremy Yuen Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-2342
Oliver TraxerDepartment of Urology Sorbonne University Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-3803
Ben Hall ChewDepartment of Urology University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-0710
Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche Ancona Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-9190
Vineet GauharDivision of Urology Ng Teng Fong General Hospital Singapore Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Flexible and navigable suction access sheath (FANS) with flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) has demonstrated favourable 30-day and 3-month outcomes for renal stones in normal anatomy. We aimed to investigate the long-term 1-year safety and efficacy of FANS for renal and ureteric stones in normal or anomalous anatomy. Methods: This prospective multicentre study included adults undergoing FURS with FANS across 11 centres in 9 countries (April 2023 to August 2024), with follow-up until August 2025. Anatomical outcomes were assessed by contrast CT (or ultrasound if CT not available) at 1 year; stone-free rate (SFR) was assessed via noncontrast CT at 30 days. The primary aim was to report if altered anatomy, such as pelvicalyceal or pelviureteric or ureteric stricture, occurs at a later stage. Results: Among 288 patients, median age was 55 years, and 4.5% had anomalous renal anatomy. About 49% were prestented. Stones were located only in the kidney (62%), ureter (18%) or both (20.1%). Median stone volume was 725 mm Conclusions: This study reports the longest 1-year follow-up data for patients undergoing FURS with FANS to date. The study did not identify a high rate of late anatomical complications after successful FANS deployment in the treatment of renal and ureteric stones. Caution is warranted in patients with a history of ureteral re-implantation due to elevated risk of stricture formation.

Indexed as

FANSflexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheathflexible ureteroscopylong‐term outcomesnephrolithiasisureteric stricture

Identifiers

PMID42095197
PMCPMC13138902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.