ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2026
Diagnostic value of abduction angle and magnetic resonance imaging in dogs with arthroscopically confirmed medial shoulder instability.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Medial shoulder instability (MSI) is a frequent cause of thoracic limb lameness in dogs, yet its diagnosis remains challenging, with arthroscopic examination considered the gold standard. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of preoperative shoulder abduction angle measurements and MRI findings for detecting MSI in dogs with arthroscopically confirmed diagnoses. Animals and procedure: Medical records from AniCura Jeløy Dyresykehus (Moss, Norway) (2017 to 2024) were retrospectively reviewed for dogs with unilateral MSI diagnosed Results: Seventeen dogs (9 males, 8 females) with a median age of 72.0 mo and a median weight of 25.0 kg were included. Median lameness grade was 2 (mild to moderate). Median shoulder abduction angles were 42° in affected shoulder and 28° in contralateral shoulder, with a median difference of 14°, ranging from 11 to 26°. The shoulder abduction angle test (threshold > 40°) showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 80.5 to 100%) for MSI detection, whereas the sensitivity of MRI examination (medial compartment pathology) was 23.5% (95% CI: 6.8 to 49.9%). Conclusion and clinical relevance: Bilateral shoulder abduction angle measurement is a practical, noninvasive, and apparently effective diagnostic tool for MSI that outperformed MRI with regard to diagnostic sensitivity in the study sample. Given the cost of MRI and need for anesthesia, shoulder abduction angle measurement may be preferable in clinical settings. Moreover, in cases of unilateral shoulder lameness, a difference > 10° in the abduction angles between the affected and contralateral "healthy" shoulders might be a simple, accessible indicator of MSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42095164PMC13142059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.