Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095133›Full record

ArticleJournal of building physics2026

Comparative performance and environmental evaluation of 222 and 254 nm UV lamps for in-duct air disinfection in building systems.

Jay Patel, Lexuan Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of building physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jay PatelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5552-8587
Lexuan ZhongDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-8826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UV germicidal irradiance has gained significant popularity as a disinfection technology since the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges remain in accurately characterizing the in-duct irradiance distribution of UVC lamps under varying air parameters, introducing uncertainty in exposure and efficiency estimations. This study experimentally characterizes irradiance of 222 and 254 nm UV lamps in a conduit using a 9-point average method. Irradiance measurements are recorded from five sides at each point, and a correction factor is proposed to account for spectrometer detection angle overlaps. Results indicate that the 254 nm lamp output increases by 18% with an air temperature rise from 25°C to 35°C but decreases by 21% as air velocity rises from 0.5 to 2 m/s. In contrast, the 222 nm lamp shows negligible sensitivity to changes in air temperature or velocity. Relative humidity variations (25%-60%) did not significantly affect either lamp's output. In addition, the 222 nm lamp generates minimal ozone and total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) during operation in stagnant air. The particle tracking simulation results revealed higher velocity fluctuations in proximity to the installed 222 nm lamp than the 254 nm lamp due to the larger lamp geometries. Experimental UVGI efficacy tests targeting airborne

Indexed as

222 nm Far-UVC254 nm UVCE. coliin-duct air disinfectionirradiancelife cycle analysisUVGI

Identifiers

PMID42095133
PMCPMC13143173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.