ArticleJB & JS open access
Comparable Outcomes and Implant Survivorship of Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy and Primary Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage knee osteoarthritis in many patients. In younger patients with predominantly medial compartment disease, high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is performed as a joint-preserving treatment. However, concerns remain regarding potentially compromised outcomes of TKA after previous HTO given the axial deviation, osteotomy site, secondary surgery, previous hardware, and instrumentation. Therefore, this study compared long-term implant survival, revision, and infection rates, and patient-reported outcomes between patients undergoing TKA after HTO and matched TKA-only controls. Methods: Postoperative complications and revision surgeries were prospectively recorded in patients who underwent TKA from 2000 to 2023 at a single academic center. Patients with previous ipsilateral HTO formed the study group and were propensity matched 1:2 to TKA-only patients without a previous osteotomy based on age, sex, and body mass index. Knee Society Scores (KSS) were collected prospectively. Implant survivorship was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The study included 134 HTO-TKA and 268 matched TKA-only patients, with a mean follow-up of 10.5 ± 6.4 years (range: 0-24 years) after TKA. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in KSS (p < 0.02) with comparable clinical outcomes (HTO-TKA: 79.0 (6.0), TKA-only: 79.0 (11.8)). Revision arthroplasty rates were 5.2% for HTO-TKA and 4.5% for TKA-only (p = 0.69); the mean time to revision was 8.1 ± 8.7 years vs. 4.4 ± 3.5 years, respectively (p = 0.30). Infection rates were 2.2% and 1.1%, respectively (p = 0.74). Conclusions: Revision and infection rates were comparable between HTO-TKA and matched TKA-only patients, with no statistically significant differences. Our findings demonstrate comparable patient-reported outcomes in both groups. These findings indicate that a previous HTO does not adversely affect TKA implant longevity or clinical outcomes when compared with matched primary TKA patients within the US population. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.