ArticleiScience2026
Filtering of artificial chimeric reads generated by ligation preparation method of nanopore sequencing.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Finishing a complete giraffe genome from telomere to telomere with Verkko-Fillet.Cell genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanopore sequencing provides long and ultra-long reads that are valuable for structural variation (SV) detection and genome assembly. However, false-positive chimeric reads can arise and interfere with somatic SV calling. Here, we show that ligation-based library preparation generates false-positive chimeric reads, particularly inverted repeats, in both microbial and human DNA standards. The proportion of inverted repeats ranged from 0.18% to 7.33%, exceeding those observed in rapid and modified rapid preparations. Analysis of raw electrical signals revealed a characteristic smoothed segment at junction sites in nearly half of these chimeric reads. Based on these features, we developed a ResNet-based deep learning classifier to identify false-positive chimeric reads. The model achieved high accuracy in both human and microbial datasets and substantially reduced SV calling errors after filtering. These results demonstrate that library preparation-induced chimeric reads can be effectively detected and mitigated, improving the reliability of nanopore-based SV analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.