Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095053›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026

Real World Outcomes of Pembrolizumab and Reduced-Dose Lenvatinib in Recurrent Endometrial Cancer by Platinum and p53 Status.

Alexa Dzienny, Yasmin Abozenah, James Griffith, Sidra Sohail, Yifang Eva Pan, Christina Vlamis, Katelyn Yamartino, Jessica Leclair, Gary Israel, Michelle Greenman and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Alexa DziennyYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Yasmin AbozenahYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
James GriffithUniversity of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, United States.
Sidra SohailUniversity of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, United States.
Yifang Eva PanYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Christina VlamisUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Farmington, CT 06030, United States.
Katelyn YamartinoYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Jessica LeclairYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Gary IsraelYale University School of Medicine, Department of Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Michelle GreenmanYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Blair McNamaraYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Masoud AzodiYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Elena S RatnerYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Alessandro SantinYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Peter DottinoYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Katyayani PapatlaYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Aparna KailasamYale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Pei HuiYale University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Natalia BuzaYale University School of Medicine, Department of Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Gary AltwergerUniversity of Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) by platinum resistance status and p53 status, and to compare outcomes between patients who started lenvatinib at doses of 10 mg or less versus standard starting doses. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with recurrent EC treated with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib between March 2019 and February 2023. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) by platinum status, p53 status, and lenvatinib dose. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and lenvatinib-related toxicity. Noninferiority was assessed using the Wald confidence interval and a propensity score-matched cohort. Results: Among 59 patients, 85% had high-grade histology, 75% were platinum-resistant, and 67.8% harbored p53 mutations. The overall ORR was 37%. There were no significant differences in ORR or PFS by grade, platinum status, or starting dose. On multivariable analysis, p53 mutation and ECOG < 2 were independently associated with improved PFS. The 10 mg lenvatinib dose demonstrated the longest median treatment duration (74 days) with improved tolerability. When stratifing lenvatinib starting dose as ≤ 10 mg versus > 10 mg, ORR was 50% and 26%, respectively. The lower dose group met criteria for noninferiority. Conclusions: In a heavily pretreated, high grade, platinum resistant population, pembrolizumab and lenvatinib showed activity comparable to prior studies despite a more resistant cohort. Reduced lenvatinib doses of 10 mg or less were associated with noninferior ORR and lower toxicity, supporting dose optimization. In addition, p53 mutation was independently associated with prolonged PFS, suggesting it may be a biomarker of response. KEY MESSAGES: What is already known on this topic:Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib has been an emerging treatment for recurrent endometrial cancer, showing survival benefit in pMMR tumors. However, most data are from clinical trials with less heavily pretreated patients, and uncertainty remains about efficacy in platinum-resistant, p53-mutated, high-grade tumors and the optimal starting dose of lenvatinib given its toxicity.What this study adds:In a real-world cohort enriched for platinum-resistant, high-grade, p53-mutated, heavily pre-treated endometrial cancers, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab achieved an objective response rate consistent with prior trials. A reduced starting dose of lenvatinib (≤10 mg) was non-inferior to higher doses, better tolerated, and associated with fewer dose reductions. Additionally, p53 mutation and good ECOG status predicted improved progression-free survival.How this study might affect research, practice or policy:These findings suggest that reduced-dose lenvatinib may maintain efficacy while improving tolerability in heavily pretreated high-grade tumors and platinum resistant, p53 mutated patients, supporting individualized dosing strategies. They also highlight p53 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker, warranting larger studies.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerLenvatinibPembrolizumabUterine carcinosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID42095053
PMCPMC13139971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.