ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2026
Skull Base Reconstruction Following Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery: A Global Survey.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estimating nasoseptal flap length for sellar reconstruction: a surgical and radiological study.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to better learn how pituitary surgery centers around the world perform the reconstruction step of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery and to understand the rationale behind their strategies. Design: Survey. Setting and Participants: Representatives of 311 centers across 54 countries were invited. Main Outcome Measures: Online 15-question questionnaire. Results: Representatives of 121 centers from 36 countries responded to the survey. We recorded a preference for multilayer reconstruction in all scenarios presented. In cases of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and extended approaches, respondents reported greater use of autologous materials, such as fat grafts, fascia lata, and pedicled flaps. Although there was no statistical significance for most of the scenarios analyzed, we observed a greater tendency to use pedicled flaps in centers with ENT specialists on the team and a lower likelihood of using them in centers with a higher surgical volume. For cases where no CSF leak is expected preoperatively, the overall preference was for the use of rescue flaps (56.10%), especially in centers in which an ENT surgeon was present (69.77%). Once a nasoseptal flap has been created, the preference is for the nasal septum to heal by secondary intention (52.23%). Conclusion: This survey provides additional evidence of the wide variability in practice and strategies among specialized pituitary/skull base surgery centers worldwide. Trends toward multilayer reconstruction, use of the nasoseptal flaps, and autologous grafts were observed. The presence of an otolaryngologist on the team influences the reconstruction strategy adopted at the institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.