Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095037›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2026

Medically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comparative Study of Outcomes of Microvascular Decompression versus Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation.

Kevin J Sudevan, Madhusudhan Nagesh, Andiperumal R Prabhuraj, Nupur Pruthi, Preetham Dange, Sattar Khan, Manish Beniwal, Nishanth Sadashiva, Vikas Vazhayil, Subhas Konar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kevin J SudevanDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Madhusudhan NageshDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Andiperumal R PrabhurajDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5986-1521
Nupur PruthiDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Preetham DangeDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sattar KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Manish BeniwalDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Nishanth SadashivaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0509-4993
Vikas VazhayilDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Subhas KonarDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Arivazhagan ArimappamaganDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The surgical options for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) are diverse, with limited comparative evidence. This study evaluates and compares pain-free period and time to recurrence for patients who underwent microvascular decompression (MVD), gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: A retrospective review of patients with medically refractory TN over a 10-year period from 2009 to 2018 at a tertiary neurosurgical center was performed. Patients with at least 1 year of follow-up after the treatment procedure were included. Clinical details, radiological records, intraoperative findings, and treatment details of radiosurgery and ablative procedures were recorded. Results: A total of 189 patients were included, the mean age being 52.54 (± 13.3) years, with a male:female ratio of 1.52:1. The mean duration of symptoms was 70.19 (± 57.6) months, with 86.3% of patients presenting with type 1 neuralgia. The median follow-up duration was 84, 100, and 67 months for MVD, GKRS, and RFA, respectively. The percentages of patients with favorable outcomes (Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score [BNI I-IIIa]) were 87.8, 67.3, and 66.5%, respectively, for MVD, GKRS, and RFA. The median pain-free intervals were 65, 59, and 36 months, with recurrence rates of 24.2, 25, and 40.5% for MVD, GKRS, and RFA, respectively. Conclusion: This study reaffirms MVD as the best first-line treatment for medically refractory TN, with GKRS being a useful alternative in patients who are surgically unfit or unwilling, and an optimum second-line treatment for those with recurrences. RFA is useful as an adjunct in patients unfit for surgery, with a high initial efficacy albeit with high recurrence rates.

Indexed as

functionalmicrosurgeryneuralgianeurovascular conflictpercutaneousradiosurgerystereotactic

Identifiers

PMID42095037
PMCPMC13143393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.