ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2026
How Expensive is ENT Surgeons' Involvement in Retrosigmoid Craniotomies? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to examine the impact of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons' involvement on intraoperative costs and operating room (OR) times for retrosigmoid craniotomies using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Design: A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted. TDABC methodology was utilized to calculate total intraoperative costs. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the independent effect of ENT surgeons' involvement on surgical costs and OR time. Setting: All procedures were performed at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and affiliated sites between 2017 and 2022. Participants: About 255 patients underwent retrosigmoid craniotomy (166 neurosurgery only, 89 with ENT surgeons' involvement). Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome measures include total intraoperative costs calculated using TDABC methodology, OR time, supply costs, and personnel costs. Results: Inclusion of ENT surgeons was significantly associated with increased total costs (B = $4,082 ± $1,015, Conclusion: While ENT collaboration can enhance outcomes in select cases, such as those involving vestibular schwannomas, its routine inclusion may not be cost-effective. Our study demonstrates the marginal cost of ENT collaboration for retrosigmoid craniotomies. Future studies may build on our costing framework by integrating outcomes with costs to determine the true cost-effectiveness of cross-specialty collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.