Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095031›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2026

Pituitary Stalk Lesion Sampling by Transsphenoidal Posterior Lobe Biopsy: A Case Series.

Kyly Hiatt, Zachary A Abecassis, Jessica Eaton, Thomas Hanks, Spencer Raub, Eliza Baird-Daniel, Zirun Zhao, Fatima El-Ghazali, Dominic Nistal, Aria Jamshidi and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kyly HiattDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-2014-6328
Zachary A AbecassisDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Jessica EatonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Thomas HanksDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Spencer RaubDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Eliza Baird-DanielDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Zirun ZhaoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Fatima El-GhazaliDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Dominic NistalDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Aria JamshidiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Kaitlyn HartlDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Dan ChildDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Amy LeeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Randall BlyDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Manuel FerreiraDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Jacob RuzevickDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Samuel EmersonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of performing posterior lobe pituitary biopsy in patients with pituitary stalk lesions compared with direct stalk biopsy. Design: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of four patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery of the posterior pituitary lobe for a lesion of the pituitary stalk without clear diagnosis, despite noninvasive workup. Participants: Four patients with known pituitary stalk lesions who underwent posterior pituitary biopsy without tumor resection. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcomes were postprocedural endocrine function across all axes compared with preoperative function, postprocedural morbidities, and ability to obtain an accurate histologic diagnosis from biopsy. Results: A total of 100% (4/4) patients were histologically diagnosed based on tissue from transsphenoidal biopsy of the posterior lobe. There was no worsening of preoperative endocrine function. One patient experienced a cerebrospinal fluid leak. There were no other postoperative complications. None of the patients experienced worsening of vision attributable to biopsy. Conclusion: Transsphenoidal posterior lobe biopsy has a low-risk profile and high diagnostic capacity in patients presenting with a lesion of the pituitary stalk of uncertain etiology.

Indexed as

biopsybright spotETSSneurohypophysispituitary stalk lesionposterior lobe

Identifiers

PMID42095031
PMCPMC13143383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.