ArticleASM case reports2026
Article in ASM case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Case Summary: We describe a 35-year-old pregnant woman with known mitral valve prolapse who presented at 21 weeks of gestation with an acute ischemic stroke. Initial etiological work-up, including transesophageal echocardiography, was unremarkable. Ten days later, she re-presented with left-arm pain and neurologic symptoms. Repeat echocardiography revealed multiple mitral vegetations compatible with infective endocarditis. Despite multiple sets of prolonged-incubation blood cultures and extensive serological testing, all microbiological investigations remained negative. Empirical intravenous ceftriaxone was initiated based on the working diagnosis of HACEK endocarditis. A plasma metagenomic cell-free DNA test ultimately identified Conclusion: This case illustrates the diagnostic challenges of culture-negative infective endocarditis in pregnancy and underscores the value of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing as a complementary tool when conventional methods fail. It also emphasizes the need to repeat echocardiography when clinical suspicion remains high and raises the question of antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk dental procedures in pregnant women with underlying valvular heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.