ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Comparison of anterior segment parameter measurements between Sirius Plus and Pentacam AXL.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This cross-sectional study compared the differences, consistencies, and correlations of the measurements of anterior segment biological parameters between Sirius Plus and Pentacam AXL in a healthy population with myopia. Methods: Eighty patients with myopia (80 eyes) scheduled for refractive surgery at the Ophthalmology Department of the Third People's Hospital of Dalian from December 2024 to June 2025 were included. One eye was randomly selected for each participant, and measurements were taken using Sirius Plus and Pentacam AXL. Fourteen parameters related to the anterior segment were extracted. Results: The differences in the measurements for anterior flat keratometry, anterior vertical/horizontal astigmatism, and anterior oblique astigmatism at 45° between the two devices were not significant, whereas those for the other parameters were significant. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for anterior flat keratometry, anterior steep keratometry, and white-to-white were 0.965, 0.963, and 0.932, respectively. The goodness-of-fit analysis showed that the Discussion: Anterior corneal keratometry and white-to-white had good correlation and consistency, indicating they are suitable mutual reference points for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.