SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy of acupuncture in managing acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture-related interventions for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) using a network meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wan fang were searched from inception to September 20, 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving patients with AECOPD and evaluating acupuncture-related interventions, alone or in combination with usual treatment, were included. The primary outcome was symptom improvement. Secondary outcomes were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize direct and indirect evidence across interventions. Results: A total of 45 randomized controlled trials involving 3,156 participants were included. Compared with usual treatment, several acupuncture-related interventions were associated with improvements in symptom-related outcomes and pulmonary function parameters. For symptom improvement, acupoint application (AA) and abdominal needle (AN) showed statistically significant associations compared with usual treatment (AA: OR = 4.97, 95% CrI 3.18-8.24; AN: OR = 6.84, 95% CrI 2.59-21.54). For pulmonary function outcomes, thunder-fire moxibustion (TFM) was associated with higher FEV1 values (MD = 0.71, 95% CrI 0.50-0.92), while conventional acupuncture (AC) and ear acupuncture (EAC) were associated with improvements in FVC and FEV1/FVC. Ranking analyses suggested that AN, TFM, AC, and AA/EAC tended to rank relatively higher for symptom improvement, FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC, respectively; however, surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values reflect ranking probabilities rather than the magnitude of treatment effects. Conclusion: Acupuncture-related interventions may provide potential adjunctive benefits for patients with AECOPD when used in combination with conventional treatment. In this network meta-analysis, several interventions were associated with improvements in symptom-related outcomes and pulmonary function parameters. However, ranking results from SUCRA should be interpreted cautiously and considered together with effect estimates and the certainty of evidence. Given that most included trials evaluated acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care and the overall certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low, further large-scale and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251080558, identifier CRD420251080558.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.