ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Risk Stratification for ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales in Elderly Diabetic Patients with Urinary Tract Infections: A Multicenter Model to Support Empirical Antibiotic Decision-Making.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Antimicrobial resistance among elderly diabetic patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) poses a significant challenge for empirical antibiotic therapy. Delayed availability of microbiological susceptibility results often leads to treatment mismatch and inappropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic use. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinically interpretable risk stratification model to estimate the probability of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales isolation prior to microbiological confirmation, thereby supporting early empirical antibiotic decision-making. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including elderly (≥60 years) patients with type 2 diabetes and positive urine cultures. Multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a prediction model for ESBL-positive isolation. Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, calibration plots, and bootstrap internal validation. Internal-external cross-validation and independent external validation were performed to assess model transportability. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to evaluate clinical net benefit across threshold probabilities. Results: A total of 612 patients were included, of whom 364 (58.6%) had ESBL-positive isolates. Independent predictors included diabetes duration ≥10 years, HbA1c ≥8.5%, recent antibiotic exposure, urinary tract device use, and low-level pyuria (<5 WBC/HPF). The model demonstrated stable discrimination (AUC 0.81 in the training set; 0.79 in internal validation; 0.81 in external validation) and good calibration (Brier score 0.18-0.19). Decision curve analysis showed meaningful clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities (10%-65%). Exploratory analysis indicated that empirical therapy mismatch was associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased sepsis incidence, underscoring the potential clinical relevance of early resistance risk identification. Conclusion: This multicenter risk stratification model provides a practical tool for early estimation of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales risk in elderly diabetic patients with UTIs. By integrating routinely available clinical and laboratory variables, the model may support antimicrobial stewardship efforts and improve empirical antibiotic decision-making before susceptibility results become available. Prospective validation in diverse healthcare settings is warranted to confirm its clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.