ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Automated Feedback Quality Assessment in Chinese Anesthesiology Residency Training.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: High-quality narrative feedback is essential for competency-based medical education, but manual evaluation of feedback is time-consuming and subjective. This research aims to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model to automate the bulk evaluation of feedback quality from anesthesiology residency program instructors. Methods: Using 990 narrative feedback entries from October 2023 to November 2025 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, we conducted training and validation. An additional 587 feedback records from Ningbo Li HuiLi Hospital were used as an external test set. Text processing employed the jieba Chinese word segmenter combined with an anesthesia-specific vocabulary database to extract TF-IDF and manual features. Data imbalance was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). Logistic regression (LR), random forests (RF), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) were used for training and validation. Model performance was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), accuracy, cross-validation accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results: In internal training, LR performed optimally, demonstrating the best overall performance (F1 score: 0.941) and stability (cross-validation accuracy: 0.925 ± 0.026), along with the highest precision (0.906). In external testing, the LR model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.808-0.867), with high recall (0.956) and moderate precision (0.636) for identifying high-quality feedback, yielding an F1 score of 0.764 and an AUC of 0.729. Conclusion: This study successfully developed and externally validated a machine learning-based model for automated feedback quality assessment in Chinese anesthesiology residency training. With its high recall and stable internal performance, the model may serve as a screening tool to support competency-based medical education by enabling batch evaluation of narrative feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.