Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094908›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026

Patient-reported distress and anxiety during cone-beam CT imaging sessions with increased gantry rotation speeds.

Atefeh Rezaei, Alex T Price, Theodore H Arsenault, Runyon Woods, Rojano Kashani, Angela Y Jia, Daniel E Spratt, Clair R Kueny, Lauren E Henke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Atefeh RezaeiUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Alex T PriceUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Theodore H ArsenaultUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Runyon WoodsUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Rojano KashaniUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Angela Y JiaUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Daniel E SprattUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Clair R KuenyDepartment Psychological Science, Missouri University of Science & Technology, 500 W. 14th St., Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Lauren E HenkeUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a prospective imaging clinical trial to evaluate rapid cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging on a C-arm linear accelerator. As part of this trial, we evaluated patient-reported anxiety and distress before and after imaging sessions to evaluate the impact of increased gantry rotation speed on patient experience. Materials and methods: Forty patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) as part of standard clinical care were separately imaged using CBCT imaging on a C-arm linear accelerator with faster gantry rotation (1.5 rpm versus standard 1.0 rpm speed used clinically) as part of an imaging clinical trial. Patient anxiety and distress were evaluated before and after multiple study imaging sessions for all patients, using the validated 6-item State- Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S-6) questionnaire. Changes in patient-reported anxiety responses throughout the patient experience on this linear accelerator with rapid on-board imaging were reported. Results: The median patient-reported STAI-S-6 anxiety level across all measurements was low at 20.0 [IQR: 20.0 - 30.0]. During the first image session, median state of anxiety scores were stable, with a median score change of 0.0 [IQR: -4.2 - 0.0] (p = 0.359). Median patient-reported state-based anxiety scores from before session 1 to after the last imaging session were significantly reduced, with median change of -3.3 [IQR: -10.0 - 0.0] (p = 0.001). For patients performing breath-hold during imaging, there was no observed association between breath-hold and state-based anxiety (p = 0.219). Conclusion: Exposure to rapid gantry rotation on a C-arm linear accelerator did not increase state-based patient-reported anxiety and distress during setup imaging for radiotherapy.

Indexed as

CBCTIGRTPatient-reported anxietyPatient-reported outcomesRapid gantry rotation

Identifiers

PMID42094908
PMCPMC13139970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.