Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094871›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health and addiction2026

Craving for a Robust Methodology: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Algorithms on Substance-Use Disorders Treatment Outcomes.

Bernardo Paim de Mattos, Christian Mattjie, Rafaela Ravazio, Rodrigo C Barros, Rodrigo Grassi-Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health and addiction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bernardo Paim de Mattos *Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1068-1992
Christian Mattjie *Machine Learning Theory and Applications Lab, School of Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3745-8686
Rafaela RavazioMachine Learning Theory and Applications Lab, School of Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4729-4993
Rodrigo C BarrosMachine Learning Theory and Applications Lab, School of Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-9482
Rodrigo Grassi-OliveiraDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9911-5921

Funding

Gene-environment interactions in COCCaINE Use Disorder: Collaborative Case-Control Initiative in Coccaine AddictionR01DA044859 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI GRASSI-OLIVEIRA, RODRIGO, SCHMITZ, JOY MARIE · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) pose significant mental health challenges due to their chronic nature, health implications, impact on quality of life, and variability of treatment response. This systematic review critically examines the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting and analyzing treatment outcomes in SUDs. Conducting a thorough search across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, we identified 28 studies that met our inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 362 articles. The MI-CLAIM and CHARMS instruments were utilized for methodological quality and bias assessment. Reviewed studies encompass an array of SUDs, mainly opioids, cocaine, and alcohol use, predicting outcomes such as treatment adherence, relapse, and severity assessment. Our analysis reveals a significant potential of ML models in enhancing predictive accuracy and clinical decision-making in SUD treatment. However, we also identify critical gaps in methodological consistency, transparency, and external validation among the studies reviewed. Our review underscores the necessity for standardized protocols and best practices in applying ML within SUD while providing recommendations and guidelines for future research. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11469-024-01403-z.

Indexed as

Machine learningPrediction modelsSubstance-related disordersSystematic reviewTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42094871
PMCPMC13139223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.