ArticleInternational journal of mental health and addiction2026
Craving for a Robust Methodology: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Algorithms on Substance-Use Disorders Treatment Outcomes.
Article in International journal of mental health and addiction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning the Boundary Between Involvement and Severity: A Multi-Target Machine-Learning Analysis of Emotion Dysregulation, Impulsivity, Gambling Involvement, and Problem Severity in Psychiatric Outpatients.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2026Article
- Applying machine learning in predicting medication treatment outcomes for opioid use disorder.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026Article
- Digital Contingency Management for Substance Use Disorder Treatment: 12-Month Quasi-Experimental Design.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUDs) pose significant mental health challenges due to their chronic nature, health implications, impact on quality of life, and variability of treatment response. This systematic review critically examines the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting and analyzing treatment outcomes in SUDs. Conducting a thorough search across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, we identified 28 studies that met our inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 362 articles. The MI-CLAIM and CHARMS instruments were utilized for methodological quality and bias assessment. Reviewed studies encompass an array of SUDs, mainly opioids, cocaine, and alcohol use, predicting outcomes such as treatment adherence, relapse, and severity assessment. Our analysis reveals a significant potential of ML models in enhancing predictive accuracy and clinical decision-making in SUD treatment. However, we also identify critical gaps in methodological consistency, transparency, and external validation among the studies reviewed. Our review underscores the necessity for standardized protocols and best practices in applying ML within SUD while providing recommendations and guidelines for future research. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11469-024-01403-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.