ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Number of children and maternal mental health in the context of China's fertility policy transition: the moderating effect of employment status and the mediating effect of family environment.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Having more children may be detrimental to maternal mental health during China's ongoing fertility policy transition. However, under what circumstances and how number of children could be associated with maternal mental health remains understudied in China. This study examined the association between number of children and maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms among mothers of middle school students in Shanghai, China. It also explored the moderating effect of maternal employment status and the mediating effect of family environment. Methods: Mothers of students from 7 middle schools in Shanghai were surveyed. In total, 4,215 valid questionnaires were obtained. The survey included sociodemographic information, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and the Chinese version of the Family Environment Scale (FES-CV). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the association between number of children and maternal anxiety/depressive symptoms. Model 1 and Model 4 of SPSS PROCESS were then employed to examine the moderating effect of employment status and the mediating effect of family environment. Results: The rates of clinically significant anxiety and depressive symptoms among mothers were 13.6% and 17.6%, respectively. The moderating effect of maternal employment status was significant. Among unemployed mothers, number of children was positively associated with both maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms, whereas among employed mothers, number of children was not associated with maternal anxiety or depression. Among unemployed mothers, family environment mediated the association between number of children and maternal anxiety/depressive symptoms through the pathways of family conflict and organization. Among employed mothers, family environment suppressed the association between number of children and maternal anxiety/depressive symptoms through the pathways of family conflict, intellectual-cultural orientation, organization, control, and independence. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that number of children per se is not necessarily associated with worsened maternal mental health. Instead, the potential changes in employment participation and family environment that accompany having more children may be more relevant. Therefore, stakeholders, clinicians, and researchers should therefore focus on these aspects when addressing maternal mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.