Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094808›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Podcasting in Ophthalmology: Advancing Education, Knowledge Dissemination, and Implications for Health Equity.

Eleanor M Richardson, Lorraine M Provencher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eleanor M RichardsonSchool of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-4597-733X
Lorraine M ProvencherVance Thompson Vision, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3344-775X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Podcasts have emerged as a prominent medium for disseminating health information in the digital era, offering on-demand, accessible content for both clinicians and the public. Within medicine, and increasingly within ophthalmology, podcasts are used for education, research dissemination, and patient engagement. Their low cost, asynchronous format, and broad accessibility also present a promising yet underutilized strategy for addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) by expanding access to reliable, equity-focused patient education and helping to overcome barriers to specialty care that contribute to preventable vision loss. This literature review examines the evolution of podcasting as a tool for medical education and public health communication, with a focused analysis of its current applications, benefits, and limitations within ophthalmology.

Indexed as

medical podcastingophthalmology educationpodcastsocial determinants of healthsocial media

Identifiers

PMID42094808
PMCPMC13142693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.