ArticlePhysical therapy research2026
Predictive Sub-items and Cutoff Scores of the Functional Assessment for Control of Trunk (FACT) for Gait Independence in Patients with Acute Stroke.
Article in Physical therapy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, we aimed to identify the predictive subitems and cutoff values of the Functional Assessment for Control of the Trunk (FACT) for independent gait in patients with acute stroke. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 110 stroke patients. The FACT was assessed early after mobilization. Logistic regression analysis was conducted with independent gait at discharge as the dependent variable and 11 independent variables, including FACT subitems 3-10 and potential confounding factors. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine cutoff values for the total FACT score in predicting independent gait. Results: For level-ground gait, FACT items 4 and 5 (odds ratios: 4.71 and 2.89, respectively) were significant predictors. For uneven-ground gait, FACT item 8 (odds ratio: 1.87) was significant. The cutoff values were 11 points (sensitivity: 84.0%; specificity: 93.3%; area under the curve [AUC]: 0.95) for level-ground gait and 15 points (sensitivity: 77.8%; specificity: 95.0%; AUC: 0.89) for uneven-ground gait. Conclusions: Early FACT scores predicted independent gait. For level-ground gait, coordinated movement of the lower limbs and trunk during forward and lateral weight shifts and extensive lateral weight-shifting ability (items 4 and 5) were key. For uneven-ground gait, the rotational ability of the bilateral lower trunk during extensive lateral weight shifts (item 8) was crucial. The present findings suggest that these predictors and cutoff values can assist in guiding the prioritization of trunk assessment and devising tailored intervention plans aimed at functional gait acquisition during the early physical therapy phase following stroke onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.