Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094764›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

From the 3rd to the 7th year after straw return, different straw-returning practices drive shifts in soil fungal community composition, functional differentiation, and the reconfiguration of community assembly processes.

Rui-Zhi Liu, Xiao-Ya Zhao, Xiao-Yu Zhao, Wen-Shan Zhao, Shu-Ping Hu, Rui-Ping Li, Xiao-Fang Yu, Ju-Lin Gao, Qinggeer Borjigin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui-Zhi LiuInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Xiao-Ya ZhaoInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Xiao-Yu ZhaoInstitute of Maize Research, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Wen-Shan ZhaoNongye Bureau of Jingyang District, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
Shu-Ping HuKey Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Genetic Improvement of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, China.
Rui-Ping LiInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Xiao-Fang YuInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Ju-Lin GaoInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Qinggeer BorjiginInner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In long-term straw-returning systems, a year-scale understanding of how contrasting tillage practices shape soil fungal succession and community assembly remains limited. Methods: Based on a long-term field experiment, we investigated soil fungal communities using ITS sequencing during years 3-7 after straw return (2020-2024) under farmer shallow rotary tillage (CK) and three treatments: deep ploughing return (DPR), subsoiling straw return (SSR), and no-tillage mulching return (NTR). Fungal diversity, community composition, functional guilds, and assembly pathways were evaluated by integrating functional guild assignment, co-occurrence network analysis, and null-model metrics (βNTI) with a neutral community model. Results: Fungal Discussion: These results demonstrate that contrasting straw-returning practices regulate fungal succession through compositional turnover, functional differentiation, and assembly reconfiguration, providing insights for optimizing straw-return management and promoting sustainable cropland systems.

Indexed as

community assembly mechanismcommunity successionsoil fungistraw returntillage practice

Identifiers

PMID42094764
PMCPMC13141306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.