Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094657›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Evaluating the changes in household purchases of foods and drinks high in fat, salt and sugar following Bristol's outdoor advertisement restrictions policy: a quasi-experimental study.

Genevieve Buckland, Carlos Sillero-Rejon, Zoi Toumpakari, Russ Jago, Amy Yau, Steven Cummins, James Nobles, Sarah Kate Harding, Jeremy Horwood, Agnes Nairn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Genevieve BucklandCentre for Public Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-6598
Carlos Sillero-RejonNIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, UK.
Zoi ToumpakariCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Russ JagoCentre for Public Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Amy YauPopulation Health Innovation Lab, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Steven CumminsPopulation Health Innovation Lab, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
James NoblesObesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Sarah Kate HardingNIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-6307
Jeremy HorwoodNIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7092-4960
Agnes NairnBristol Hub for Gambling Harms Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
William HollingworthPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sarah BlakeCentre for Research in Health and Social Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Frank de VochtCentre for Public Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2021, Bristol (UK) became the first city outside London to introduce a policy restricting advertisements of high fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) products and other unhealthy commodities (alcohol, gambling and payday loans) on council-owned advertisement sites, predominantly bus stops. This research evaluates the impact of this policy on household purchasing of HFSS products specifically. Methods: Take-home purchasing data for food and drink items recorded from October 2020 to May 2023 (74 weeks before and 59 weeks after policy implementation) by 1012 households from Kantar's Worldpanel division were included in the analysis: 217 households from Bristol (intervention) and 795 from Cardiff, Sheffield, Gloucestershire and South Gloucestershire (controls). Controlled interrupted time-series analyses adjusted for confounders were used to estimate the change in average weekly household purchases of energy and nutrients from HFSS products in the post-intervention period (from 1 April 2022) compared with the counterfactual (data from controls and pre-intervention in Bristol). Results: There was no indication of changes in purchasing of HFSS products in Bristol following the policy; mean change in weekly household purchases of energy and nutrients from take-home HFSS products was 897.6 kcal (95% CI -57.7 to 1.853) or 6.1% (95% CI -0.7 to 12.9) for energy, 4.6% (95% CI -2.6 to 11.9) for fat, 6.1% (95% CI -2.9 to 15.0) for sugar and -1.9% (95% CI -17.4 to 13.6) for salt, respectively, compared with the counterfactual. Stratified analyses by household socio-demographics also showed no evidence of changes in energy purchased from HFSS products in Bristol. Conclusions: This study did not observe evidence of changes in purchasing of HFSS products following Bristol's advertising restriction policy. Bristol City Council owns a relatively small part (~30%) of the city's outdoor advertisement estate, so changes in exposure may have been too small to lead to measurable effects. Extending similar policies to cover more outdoor spaces and advertising platforms is probably required to impact purchasing behaviour.

Indexed as

Food QualityObesityPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID42094657
PMCPMC13141093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.