ArticleBMJ public health2026
Exploring the determinants of sexual and reproductive health knowledge and intentions for safer sexual practice among out-of-school adolescents in northern rural settings in Burundi: a cross-sectional population-based study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Comprehensive Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) knowledge is critical for reducing unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among adolescents in low-resource settings. We assessed SRHR knowledge gaps among rural, out-of-school adolescents in Burundi and examined associations with intentions for safer practices (eg, condom use). Methods: We purposively sampled and surveyed 767 out-of-school adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years from the rural settings of Ngozi health district in northern Burundi examining their SRHR knowledge and practice. We employed the Rasch model of the Item Response Theory (IRT) to examine overall SRHR knowledge and by gender, assuming that the test was administered an infinite number of times and supplemented this model with a multiple linear regression to detect factors affecting knowledge. Determinants of intentions for safer sexual practice were investigated using logistic regression. Results: First, although the test drew on basic SRHR skills, it appeared to be difficult for the study population. Indeed, participants needed a minimum underlying competence Conclusion: Rural and out-of-school adolescents have lower than expected SRHR knowledge. Those who have never heard about SRHR and those whose parents and/or siblings have lower or no education are worse off. SRHR knowledge determines intentions for sexual health behaviours (eg, condom use, seeking HIV testing). Tailored SRHR programmes for rural adolescents should address misconceptions on condoms/contraception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.