ArticleBMJ public health2026
Partner support, communication and family planning choices among Nigerian women: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Partner involvement plays a critical role in shaping women's contraceptive choices, yet evidence on its influence remains limited in Nigeria, where contraceptive prevalence is low. This study explored how partner support and communication affect women's family planning decisions. Methods: A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study was conducted over 6 weeks at the family planning clinic of a tertiary healthcare facility in southwest Nigeria, using in-depth interviews, with data analysed through inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-step framework. Using purposive sampling, 20 women aged 21-42 years were recruited for in-depth interviews. Trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, independent coding and peer debriefing. Results: Participants were mostly married (90%) and had secondary or tertiary education; they showed varied awareness of contraceptive methods, with knowledge gaps mainly around side effects. Partner influence ranged from encouragement and financial or emotional support to neutral acceptance, shaping women's autonomy and method choice. Frequent and open spousal communication facilitated shared decision-making, while cultural expectations for large families and health concerns acted as barriers. Healthcare providers were key sources of information; however, participants emphasised the need for greater male engagement in family planning education. Conclusion: These findings suggest that male partners play an important role in shaping contraceptive decision-making through attitudes, support and communication. Strengthening male engagement and couple-centred approaches may improve family planning uptake in similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.