ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Visual activity in primate superior colliculus requires geniculostriate input.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The superior colliculus (SC) is an ancient visual structure whose principle source of visual drive comes directly from the retina. In primates, however, the SC also receives geniculostriate input from primary visual cortex (V1) via the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), making it unclear which pathway normally drives visually evoked spiking. Here we tested whether visually evoked spiking in the primate SC depends on retinal signals routed through LGN and V1, rather than on direct retinal input alone. We recorded from macaque SC neurons before and during reversible inactivation of the ipsilateral LGN and found that LGN inactivation nearly abolished visually evoked spiking. This loss was not due to nonspecific suppression of SC, because saccade-related bursts were spared and was observed across SC layers. Magnocellular-biased stimuli, designed to reveal any potential direct retinal drive, failed to produce visually evoked spiking during LGN inactivation. Interhemispheric inhibition (i.e., a "Sprague effect") was ruled out, because contralateral SC silencing during LGN inactivation did not restore SC visual responses. Consistent with a geniculostriate input route to SC, V1 inactivation also reduced SC visual responses, with effects proportional to the overlap between the V1-induced scotoma and the stimulus representation. Together, these results show that visually evoked neural responses in primate SC depend on retinal signals routed through LGN and V1, and that direct retinotectal input is insufficient to drive SC spiking in the absence of geniculostriate input. These findings revise current models of visual drive to the primate SC and constrain theories of SC-dependent visual behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.