ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Data-driven prioritization of mouse strains for improved preclinical modeling of rare and common disease.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 5% Problem: How the Biomedical Community Responded to the Animal-to-Human Translation Crisis, and the Case for Non-Animal Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Choosing an appropriate mouse genetic background is a persistent challenge for successful translation of preclinical disease modeling. We present Strain Recommender, a genomic framework that prioritizes inbred mouse strains as relatively vulnerable or resilient to a disease state using disease-associated gene signatures and strain-specific transcriptome predictions. The method represents disease states as weighted gene scores, ranks 657 strains based on resemblance to the disease state, and estimates uncertainty via a permutation-derived false positive rate (FPR). In a prospective validation of connective tissue disorder predictions, vulnerable and resilient Collaborative Cross strains showed significantly different cardiovascular abnormalities. In a global retrospective validation predicting previously reported strain background effects, Strain Recommender achieved ≥ 90% sensitivity for 86.6% of diseases with 94.4% mean sensitivity (95% CI: 94.0-94.8%) across 5,890 diseases, including 92.3% (95% CI: 91.6-93.0%) for 2,598 rare diseases, demonstrating its potential to improve the validity of mouse models of human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.