ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
PixelDeck: A local-first media library manager for biomedical imaging.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Modern biomedical imaging workflows generate large volumes of derived images and short videos that must be reviewed, compared, curated, and reused following primary acquisition and analysis. In practice, these assets are often dispersed across nested filesystem hierarchies on local drives, external media, or network storage, limiting efficient retrieval, deduplication, and figure assembly. We present PixelDeck, an open-source, local-first browser application for organizing and interactively browsing large biomedical image and video libraries on commodity workstations. PixelDeck integrates recursive folder import, SHA-256-based duplicate detection, metadata extraction, thumbnail and preview generation, full-text search, and asynchronous export within a responsive interface, supported by a modular ingestion pipeline, managed storage layer, and interactive browsing environment optimized for high-volume media collections. The system is implemented using a Next.js and React frontend, a SQLite metadata store accessed via Prisma, managed local media storage, and a background worker that executes import and export tasks asynchronously, enabling scalable processing on standard hardware. To evaluate performance, we conducted structured benchmark imports using public histopathology images curated from PanopTILs, SICAPv2, and PanNuke datasets, where dataset-specific import behavior, duplicate detection, and ingestion metrics were recorded as reproducible outputs. Embedding-based analysis further demonstrates dataset-level separation consistent with underlying image characteristics. These results show that PixelDeck provides an efficient, scalable local curation layer for heterogeneous biomedical imaging collections, enabling streamlined dataset exploration and preparation for downstream analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.