ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Modulation statistics allow robust prediction of speech recognition accuracy across many words, voices, and natural background sounds.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although humans excel at speech recognition, recognition accuracy can vary widely due to differences in background environments as well as the speaker's voice quality, intonation, and pitch. Predicting when speech recognition will succeed or fail, however, remains an ongoing challenge in hearing research. Here we characterize recognition abilities across a wide range of natural conditions using digits spoken by many male and female talkers of multiple ages with 33 unique backgrounds. Across this diverse set of sounds, speech recognition is most strongly influenced by the spectrum and modulation statistics of the noise. Yet, articulatory features of the speech, including fundamental and formant frequencies, show categorically distinct modulatory effects on accuracy across age, gender, and words. We then show that a low-dimensional model of sound, based on computations in the auditory midbrain, accounts for participants' single-trial recognition behavior across voices, words and backgrounds. Thus, speech-in-noise perception across extremely diverse natural conditions depends largely on a simple set of spectrotemporal statistics likely encoded by central neural populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.