Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094472›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Modulation statistics allow robust prediction of speech recognition accuracy across many words, voices, and natural background sounds.

Alex C Clonan, Ian H Stevenson, Monty A Escabi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex C ClonanElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
Ian H StevensonBiomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.ORCID 0000-0002-1428-5946
Monty A EscabiElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.ORCID 0000-0001-7271-1061

Funding

CRCNS: The Role of Statistical Structure for Natural Sound Recognition in NoiseR01DC020097 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI ESCABI, MONTY A · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
CRCNS: Predictive Models of Human Speech Recognition in Natural Environmental NoiseR01DC023478 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI MONTY A ESCABI · 2025 to 2026
$657k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020097NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC023478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although humans excel at speech recognition, recognition accuracy can vary widely due to differences in background environments as well as the speaker's voice quality, intonation, and pitch. Predicting when speech recognition will succeed or fail, however, remains an ongoing challenge in hearing research. Here we characterize recognition abilities across a wide range of natural conditions using digits spoken by many male and female talkers of multiple ages with 33 unique backgrounds. Across this diverse set of sounds, speech recognition is most strongly influenced by the spectrum and modulation statistics of the noise. Yet, articulatory features of the speech, including fundamental and formant frequencies, show categorically distinct modulatory effects on accuracy across age, gender, and words. We then show that a low-dimensional model of sound, based on computations in the auditory midbrain, accounts for participants' single-trial recognition behavior across voices, words and backgrounds. Thus, speech-in-noise perception across extremely diverse natural conditions depends largely on a simple set of spectrotemporal statistics likely encoded by central neural populations.

Identifiers

PMID42094472
PMCPMC13142404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.