Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094435›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

A systematic evaluation and benchmarking of text summarization methods for biomedical literature: From word-frequency methods to language models.

Fabio Baumgärtel, Enrico Bono, Lucas Fillinger, Louiza Galou, Kinga Keska-Izworska, Samuel M Walter, Peter Andorfer, Klaus Kratochwill, Paul Perco, Matthias Ley

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabio BaumgärtelDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0000-0243-2673
Enrico BonoDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0007-7272-5034
Lucas FillingerDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-8097
Louiza GalouDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0008-5176-2802
Kinga Keska-IzworskaDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4329-1499
Samuel M WalterDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-5654
Peter AndorferDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0003-3492-4017
Klaus KratochwillDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0803-614X
Paul PercoDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2087-5691
Matthias LeyDelta4 GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6853-8542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of biomedical literature demands automated summarization tools that reliably condense research articles into concise, accurate summaries. We benchmarked 62 summarization methods, ranging from frequency-based and TextRank extractors to encoder-decoder models (EDMs) and large language models (LLMs), on 1,000 biomedical abstracts from 20 journals across

Indexed as

benchmarkingbiomedical text summarizationlarge language modelsnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID42094435
PMCPMC13142433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.