Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094369›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

CountESS: a flexible, graphical pipeline tool for deep mutational scanning analysis.

Nick Moore, Callum J Sargeant, Matthew J Wakefield, Nicholas A Popp, Douglas M Fowler, Alan F Rubin

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nick MooreThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Callum J SargeantThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Matthew J WakefieldThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas A PoppUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Douglas M FowlerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alan F RubinThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1474-605X

Funding

The Center for Actionable Variant Analysis; measuring variant function at scaleUM1HG011969 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Douglas M Fowler, Lea Starita · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG011969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) experiments generate large volumes of sequencing data that must be processed through multi-step computational pipelines to yield interpretable variant scores. At least twelve dedicated tools have been published for this purpose, yet the diversity of experimental designs, scoring strategies, and software implementations has produced a fragmented landscape in which no single tool accommodates the full range of workflows encountered in practice. Here we present CountESS (Count-based Experiment Scoring and Statistics), an open-source pipeline tool that provides a modular, graphical interface for constructing flexible DMS analysis workflows. CountESS supports a wide range of input formats, barcode translation, HGVS variant calling, and user-defined scoring functions, enabling it to accommodate diverse experimental designs including selection assays, time-series experiments, and bin-based assays such as VAMP-seq. Implemented in Python with DuckDB as a computational backend, the software provides high-performance, memory-efficient processing suitable for large datasets. CountESS is freely available at https://github.com/CountESS-Project/CountESS under the 3-Clause BSD Licence. Supplementary data, including demonstration pipelines and example datasets, are available at https://github.com/CountESS-Project/countess-demo.

Identifiers

PMID42094369
PMCPMC13142420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.