ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2026
Predicting relapse and rehospitalization in alcohol use disorder: A psychodiagnostic perspective.
Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic relapsing disorder with high early rehospitalization rates. Valid instruments assessing dependence severity, craving, and relapse risk are fundamental for follow-up. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Hungarian Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (SADQ), Multidimensional Alcohol Craving Scale (MACS), Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) and Alcohol Relapse Risk Scale (ARRS), and test their utility in predicting relapse risk and rehospitalization. Ninety-three AUD inpatients were assessed on hospitalization day 8 with SADQ, AUDIT, MACS, PACS, visual analogue scale (VAS) of craving and ARRS, and followed for 3 months. Internal consistency and concurrent validity were evaluated. We tested whether SADQ and ARRS predicted 3-month rehospitalization (logistic regressions), whether MACS and PACS predicted relapse risk (linear regression). The 3-month rehospitalization rate was 21.5%. All scales showed high internal consistency (α = 0.86-0.94) and concurrent validity. After item reduction based on item-total correlations, the 27-item ARRS (ARRS-27) showed higher internal consistency, and predicted rehospitalization (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.18; p < 0.001). Higher SADQ scores predicted rehospitalization (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09; p = 0.007). MACS (p < 0.001) and PACS (p = 0.046) scores predicted ARRS scores (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.