SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Role-playing interventions in adult psychotherapy: a systematic review of clinical applications, reported outcomes, and future directions.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Role-playing has been employed across diverse psychotherapeutic traditions, yet no comprehensive synthesis has examined contemporary applications with adult populations and analyzed which theoretical orientations have reported beneficial or positive outcomes and under what implementation modalities. Objective: This systematic review with narrative synthesis aimed to summarize empirical evidence (2015-2025) on the use of role-playing in adult psychotherapy, examining implementation patterns (clinical populations, design and duration, descriptions of role-playing procedures), therapeutic outcomes, and emerging trends across theoretical frameworks. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science for empirical studies published between January 2015 and May 2025. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) receiving psychotherapeutic interventions that incorporated role-playing or related enactment techniques (e.g., psychodrama, empty-chair technique, behavioral rehearsal), defined as therapeutic interventions in which the therapist assigns and guides the enactment of roles to foster psychological change. Results: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Most (≈77-80%) adopted psychodramatic frameworks, primarily in group settings (73%), addressing conditions such as depression, trauma, substance use, chronic illness, dementia, fibromyalgia, infertility, and complicated grief. Across studies, consistent improvements were observed in symptom reduction, emotional regulation, interpersonal functioning, and empowerment, with preliminary evidence for psychophysiological changes (e.g., cortisol reduction, neural connectivity). Role-playing was most frequently conceptualized within psychodramatic or experiential models, but promising integrative applications combined psychodrama with cognitive-behavioral, emotion-focused, and person-centered approaches. Conclusion: Findings from this review suggest promising but preliminary evidence regarding the use of role-playing as a flexible and theoretically versatile intervention that can be adapted across clinical populations and orientations. Considering its reported beneficial effects across diverse clinical contexts, there is substantial potential for other therapeutic approaches to systematically integrate and investigate role-playing within their own theoretical frameworks. Future studies should therefore explore how role-playing can be used in different models of psychotherapy, employ rigorous designs, standardized outcome measures, and longitudinal assessments, and examine both in-session and out-of-session enactments to clarify processes of change and long-term effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.