ArticleInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology2026
Retrospective Analysis of Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Laboratory Findings of Patients Diagnosed with Brucellosis and Review of the Literature.
Article in Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brucellosis in the One Health Context: Gaps in Diagnosis, Control, and Global Epidemiology.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Review
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting neurobrucellosis in hospitalized patients with brucellosis: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Brucellosis has significant public health and human health consequences. It causes significant economic hardship, especially in areas where food safety measures, hygiene standards, and veterinary care are inadequate. This study aimed to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory results, complications, and treatment modalities of patients with brucellosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥18 years who were followed for brucellosis between December 2018 and December 2023 in the Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology clinics of two hospitals located in endemic provinces of Türkiye. Demographic characteristics, risk factors, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, focal complications, diagnostic methods, and treatment regimens were analyzed. Brucellosis was diagnosed based on compatible clinical findings together with culture positivity or serologic test results. Results: The study included 748 patients diagnosed with brucellosis. Of these, 484 (64.7%) were female, and the mean age was 39.2 ± 15.0 years. A significant proportion of patients (91%) lived in rural areas. Regarding transmission routes, 79.4% of patients reported consuming unpasteurized fresh cheese. Patients were categorized as follows: 72.7% had acute brucellosis, 20.6% had subacute brucellosis, and 6.7% had chronic brucellosis. The most frequently reported symptoms were joint pain (89%) and malaise (65.3%). A comparative analysis showed that patients with acute brucellosis had significantly higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels than those in other subgroups. The most prevalent laboratory findings were elevated CRP (50.3%), elevated ESR (37.6%), and anemia (33.3%). Hepatobiliary and osteoarticular complications developed in 22.6% and 6.5% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Brucellosis in this endemic region predominantly affected women and individuals living in rural areas and was strongly associated with the consumption of unpasteurized dairy products. Our findings emphasize the need for improved public awareness and preventive measures, particularly regarding safe dairy consumption, in endemic settings. Graphic Abstract: Graphic Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.