Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094233›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Predictive models for mortality readmission events and cardiovascular complications in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ilektra M Papazoglou, Hassan Abbas, Patrick Murphy, Nicholas Hart, Abdel Douiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilektra M PapazoglouSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5366-7556
Hassan AbbasSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Patrick MurphyKing's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1500-611X
Nicholas HartKing's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6863-585X
Abdel DouiriSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-4433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COPD is a major global health burden, associated with high rates of mortality, readmissions and cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications. Predictive models, including statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches, have been developed to support risk stratification and clinical decision-making. This review assesses their performance and generalisability. Methods: A systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and PubMed identified studies published since 2015 evaluating predictive models for COPD-related outcomes. Studies were screened using predefined criteria, and model performance was synthesised Results: Of 3 488 records screened, 37 studies met inclusion criteria: 20 focused on mortality, 14 on readmissions and six on CVD complications. Statistical models had a pooled AUC of 0.787 (95% CI 0.755-0.816). For mortality, statistical models outperformed or matched ML models (AUC 0.801 Conclusions: ML models improve readmission prediction but offer no consistent advantage for mortality, where statistical models perform similarly. ML models face generalisability challenges due to overfitting. Future work should emphasise real-world validation and hybrid approaches to enhance interpretability and clinical applicability in COPD care.

Identifiers

PMID42094233
PMCPMC13139928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.