Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42094218›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Management of Intra-operative Contamination of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft: A Cross-Sectional Survey of UK Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Hassan Kazemi, Josh Henry, Jack A Turnbull, Neil Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hassan KazemiTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, GBR.
Josh HenryOrthopaedics, Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, GBR.
Jack A TurnbullTrauma and Orthopaedics, Health Education England North West, Manchester, GBR.
Neil JainTrauma and Orthopaedics, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Oldham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Intra-operative anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft contamination is a rare but recognised complication. There are no guidelines or consensus on the management of this occurrence. Our aim was to survey trauma and orthopaedic surgeons with a knee subspecialty interest in the United Kingdom (UK) who perform ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to explore the preferred strategy when there is intra-operative graft contamination. Methods An online questionnaire was sent to UK ACLR surgeons. The survey included the year of training completion, the average number of ACLs per year, whether they have experienced any intra-operative graft contamination, the strategies implemented, and whether they are aware of any literature and how it has influenced their strategies. Results Twenty-eight responses were received, with an average of 11 years of experience in ACLR, totalling an estimated of more than 15,000 ACLR. Three surgeons surveyed had experienced a single intra-operative ACL graft contamination, all of which were soaked in chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) solution. Of those surgeons who had not encountered a contaminated graft, 11 (44%) would use CG, 7 (28%) would soak in saline and vancomycin solution, and 7 (28%) would harvest a new graft. Conclusions There is significant variation in management strategy for an intra-operative contaminated graft in ACLR. This variation highlights the need for further work to develop a consensus for guidance for ACLR surgeons.

Indexed as

aclgraft contaminationgraft decontaminationgraft sterilisationintraoperative contamination

Identifiers

PMID42094218
PMCPMC13143141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.