ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A multi-task and explainable swin transformer framework for cross-scale computational pathology in gastrointestinal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate identification and segmentation of tumor and microenvironment features in gastrointestinal cancer (GC) pathology images are crucial for diagnosis, yet challenging for traditional methods. This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning (ML) framework integrating multi-task learning and interpretability mechanisms for cross-scale automatic classification and segmentation of tumor and microenvironmental structures in gastrointestinal cancer histopathological patches, and to evaluate its robustness, output consistency, and decision transparency under controlled benchmark settings. Methods: We constructed a multi-task learning (MTL) model integrating Swin Transformer, DeepLabV3+, and R2U-Net for joint classification and segmentation. The model was trained and validated on approximately 99,000 H&E-stained images from the GasHisSDB and GCHTID datasets. Preprocessing included color normalization and quality control. Performance was evaluated via five-fold cross-validation. Explainability was assessed using Grad-CAM, Score-CAM, and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), with validation from pathology experts. Results: The multi-task model achieved a classification F1-score of 0.938 ± 0.007 and a segmentation Dice coefficient of 0.839 ± 0.009 on the test set. Compared with ResNet-50, Swin-T obtained higher classification performance, with improved F1-score (0.945 vs. 0.917) and AUC (0.965 vs. 0.907). For small-volume tissues, the LYM Dice reached 0.781. In cross-domain transfer from GCHTID to GasHisSDB, the model achieved an F1-score of 0.902. Under staining perturbations, the Dice decreased by only 2.4%, and Grad-CAM correlation reached r = 0.86. The expert-model agreement rate (EMAR) was 0.864, with a Cohen's κ of 0.79. Conclusion: The proposed cross-scale multi-task Transformer framework achieves high-precision recognition and multi-component segmentation of gastrointestinal cancer histopathological images, demonstrating stability and interpretability across scale variations, cross-dataset evaluations, and staining perturbation tests. Overall, this study emphasizes the establishment and validation of a methodological paradigm integrating multi-task joint learning, cross-scale generalization assessment, and interpretable evidence review. As the current validation was conducted under controlled benchmark conditions using strongly annotated patch-level data, the framework should be regarded as a clinically relevant, preclinical validation system. Its feasibility for routine clinical implementation requires further verification through large-scale whole-slide image (WSI) cohorts, prospective multicenter studies, and workflow integration assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.